Scholar ScribeC&J-RPS

Authors are expected to follow recognized reporting guidelines appropriate to the study design, so that manuscripts remain complete, interpretable, and reviewable. The journal uses EQUATOR-aligned checklist routing to match common study types with standard reporting frameworks, including CONSORT for randomized trials, STROBE for observational studies, PRISMA for systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and TRIPOD/TRIPOD-AI for prediction models, including machine-learning-enabled prognostic or diagnostic modelling. Where applicable, the relevant checklist must be completed and submitted with the manuscript, with page-location mapping for each checklist item.

Reporting Guidelines

For submissions, editorial queries, policy clarifications, and procedural assistance, contact the editorial office using the official email and postal address published on this page. Communication should include the manuscript title (or manuscript ID, if assigned) and a concise description of the request.

Response windows

The editorial office endeavours to respond within the published service window. Response times may vary during peak submission cycles or when queries require consultation with editors.

Complaints and appeals intake

Complaints and appeals must be submitted in writing with:
1

A clear subject line,

2

A factual description of the concern

3

Supporting evidence where available

4

The requested remedy

Appeals are processed under the journal's appeals mechanism described in Submission & Peer Review Process and governed by the principles stated in Publication Ethics.

Professional conduct expectation

All correspondence must remain professional and evidence-based. Abusive, threatening, or coercive communication is treated as a governance concern and may limit further engagement.